It an improvement over Sierra and most of the glitches that I care about have been taken of. The Mac Mini is $400 more expensive, and if push came to shove I could get a more impressive 2010 mac pro with dual processors or even a 2013 3.7ghz trash can mac pro. Answer (1 of 4): Can’t speak to your IMac - but I have installed it on 2010 Mac Pro with 64 GB RAM and a 2015 iMac with 32 GB RAM. The 2010 Mac Pro's I've been looking at are the ball park of the following specs.Ģ010 Mac Pro 3.33GHz Intel Xeon + 32GB RAM + 2TB HD MacBook Pro 15' (Late 2008-Mid 2012) MacBook Pro 17' (All Models) iMac 17' (All Models) iMac 20' (All Models) iMac 24' (All Models) iMac 27' (All Models) Mac Mini (Mid 2010-Late 2012) Mac Pro (All Models) Because Apple has taken to soldering the RAM to the motherboard of the computer - particularly on laptops in the last few years. and have found my CPU is getting maxed out to the point I can even edit projects anymore (even after bouncing and freezing nearly the whole project.)Īnyway, getting to the point, I want to know if it would be a good idea to invest in an older (what seems like more powerful machine on paper to me) 2010 Mac pro or the new M1 Mac Mini? ![]() My projects in logic pro are reaching up to 100+ tracks, I use some heavy CPU soft synths like Serum, kontakt, fm8, waves plugins etc. I use it mainly for Logic Pro X and have found it to crashing a lot recently as my projects are becoming bigger and more demanding CPU & ram wise. ![]() I'm currently in the market to upgrade my MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2010), 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7, 8GB DDR3 Ram.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |